Re: Mafia VI: Day Four [2nd-4th Jan]: Hell's Bells
But seriously, taking out Demelza, who thus far ha been of no threat to the Mafia, is very startling. The only notable relationship between her and someone in this game would be her and Linkachu. Linkachu, who, can be a very convincing townsperson.On the several ocassions she has been Mafia, she fooled everyine until the end, only dying via Underboss or Prieat Smite. She haa yet to be convicted during the day. Do not make the mistake of trusting her in this game.
I actually find this argument strange coming from you of all people. Dem's a close friend of mine, therefore the ONLY explanation in your eyes is that I killed her? You can't even entertain the idea that she was killed off at random, because someone saw her as a threat, or because someone's trying to pin her death on me
because I'm the closest link to her? You're usually a very logical person with your arguments but this time you're laying it on pretty thick, and pretty one-sided. o.O
That scenario spreads more suspicion towards Katie, also if we take a look at the Question and Answers topic, Katie asked if the gadgeteer could stay anonymous, which was asked after the gadgeteer role was stolen, perhaps she was seeing if she could spread detrimental gadgets without being found out. Katie, we need answers from you ASAP we've got around 25 hours before Day 4 ends and voting will be commencing shortly, if not I'm gonna have to vote for you just on the basis of being my strongest lead.
I asked those questions for the same reason you likely assume that I did. I wanted to know 100% if RMA would've had to have revealed his role to someone else before making a trade with them. If so, that would've meant that RMA would never trade with someone unless he believed they were trustworthy. However, Petey explained that such is not the case, therefore RMA could have simply given people gadgets instead of trading with them.
Why did I want to know this info? Because of this.
So that leaves you (Sho) and Katie, from what I've heard from others RMA would have more likely have told you rather than Katie.
Because I thought the exact same thing. Out of every member involved in this current Mafia round, you, Sho, were the one I felt was the most likely candidate as someone RMA may have trusted with the details of his role. Up until this point nobody has outright suspected you as being Mafia and, for the most part, people had pretty well written it off as even being a possibility until now. Even Red didn't try to identify you. Before Red died he messaged me his detective results, which were for Dem (townie) and El (townie).
And now you've said this:
Or, the Thief found out that RMA was the Gadgeteer and took his role. At the same time, the Mafia found out RMA's role and killed him to remove him and his gadgets.
and this:
As it turns out, the role was Gadgeteer, what we know to be a very tricky role to work. And while we all agree that the Thief(now Gadgeteer) working for the Mafia would be a disaster, we've still yet to see any evidence of it happening. So until we know the alignment of the Thief, we can't say that anything is set in stone as to how to approach dealing with them.
To put it bluntly, I've been trying to figure out if you're the thief, Sho. The more you speak about the thief, suggesting that RMA died by coincidence or that the Thief stole his role for some noble Townie reason, the less I'm trusting you.
Since day 2 Josh hasn't done anything overly suspicious and he has been trying to make solid arguments since. Like others I backed him regarding Karu because I too suspected that Karu was hiding something. Evidently, he was, just not what I would've hoped for. >_>
You on the other hand keep changing your target depending on who's the most suspicious at any given time or who others would likely
believe to be the most suspicious. You're attacking Josh as if he was the mastermind behind Karu's death but I know full well that you were involved in that initial chat conversation too, Sho. Josh was just running with the hunches of the group.
The final tip-off that you may be hiding something is this:
I have survived as long as I have becausw, like I mwntioned in the previous Day, he Mafia this round are predictable and therefore manipulatable. I only really survived last night because of that post I made, and you all know it.
You're right. The Mafia are being predictable this game. Red was resurrected and as expected, they freaked. They killed him off right away. And yet, not all of them targeted him. Dem also died that same night.
Also, I am fairly certain that /I/ am the one who mentined reviving Res, except I wanted to revive him immediately so the Mafia would waste time killing him again.
If it's true that you're the one who mentioned it, isn't that precisely something a manipulative player would do in order to control the Mafia members that night? And yet not all three families went after Red. One went after Dem, the odd player out who'd really drawn zero suspicion to herself beyond being quiet. Why her? Why not yourself or me? And why did you immediately pin her death on me the first chance you got?
I knew Dem was a townie due to Red's intel, so what would I have gained by killing her? People suspect me enough as it is. And yet there was something others could gain by killing her. You pointed that out yourself.
This all adds up to what I'd begun to suspect as the days went by and neither myself or yourself was lynched. I believe you are Mafia, and I'd be very surprised if I'm wrong.
Lynch Shocari.