• Welcome back to Pokécharms! We've recently launched a new site and upgraded forums, so there may be a few teething issues as everything settles in. Please see our Relaunch FAQs for more information.

New pokemon are getting robotic!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Carmen Lopez

Carmen Lopez

Can you give some examples. By robotic do you mean there are more steel types? I'm as confused as Goeman. But seriously everyone has Pokemon they don't like in every generation including the first one. I personally can't stand the Rattata line. So I don't think the Pokemon are getting worse or um... robotic(?)
 
Goemon2057

Goemon2057

Twilight Raikou said:
It's well for example the legendary pokemon HAVE details (alot) but it makes them seem a bit hard to tell.....again my opinion.
Click to expand...

details?Mesprit azel and uxie just remind me of mew with a different head and tail,as for the cover legendaries they're built around their respective jewel (pearl or diamond)

Arceus looks fluffy to me....
 
T

Twilight Raikou

lol yes every body loves Fluffy pokemon but my though is you see yanma(how ever u spell it) and then u see its evolution! And a new pokemon series is going to come out! they are going to look even more freaky!? i bet there is going to be an evolution for an already evolved Eevee! :'( lol
 
M

Meangreen

Hmm, I think I see what the OP is getting at and thats the idea that the new pokemon somehow seem less related to previous styles of pokemon, be they evo's or completely new species. It's like the point I made about what Charizard would look like if he was created for this new gen instead of for the first.

However, this being the debate forum and all, I'd just like to suggest that maybe a good analogy would be fashion in the eighties. It was cool at the time but style has moved on and some people still find the old styles attractive whilst others (me included) find it pretty awful. Pokemon design has done the same, time has moved on and stylistic cues have changed yet some people prefer old to new or vice-versa.

People who cry foul at the new designs do have to take into account that time separates each gen and will leave an obvious mark.
 
M

Myouki

Meangreen said:
Hmm, I think I see what the OP is getting at and thats the idea that the new pokemon somehow seem less related to previous styles of pokemon, be they evo's or completely new species. It's like the point I made about what Charizard would look like if he was created for this new gen instead of for the first.

However, this being the debate forum and all, I'd just like to suggest that maybe a good analogy would be fashion in the eighties. It was cool at the time but style has moved on and some people still find the old styles attractive whilst others (me included) find it pretty awful. Pokemon design has done the same, time has moved on and stylistic cues have changed yet some people prefer old to new or vice-versa.

People who cry foul at the new designs do have to take into account that time separates each gen and will leave an obvious mark.
Click to expand...

hmmm.... yeah, when i first saw some of the evolved forms of older pokemon, i just laughed... it looked like with some of them they just added more wings/ arms/ tails/ made bigger... a new build on an old concept that didn't quite work...
 
T

Trainer Zero

The freakier, the better. My battle party consists of the most terrifying-looking monsters in the game. There isn't a one under 5'5" or without spikes, horns, and sharp teeth. ;)
 
S

Shaymin

Well in my opinion I think Pokemon has gotten a little weird. But Pokemon I think is going to end in about 3 years or sooner. I'm not saying I want it to but Pokemon has gotten a bit unpopular. Well as they say all good things come to an end.|< But I don't believe Pokemon has gotten more "robotic".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top